Quote:
|
Originally Posted by newlittleperson
Yes, I guess there's no hard and fast rule. Funny think with the links though is that I just thought I'd check a few of the sites with link:www.... and one of them only had 2!!
Admittedly that was on p20 or something BUT it's still better than me.
|
No! It's not funny. Well, I suppose it is, but it's not strange.
I'll explain - understand, though, that this is my opinion only:
To rank well in MSN (or Yahoo, Google, etc. for that matter) I'm not convinced that sheer numbers of incoming links are the answer.
My experience is that my sites beat others not by numbers but by quality.
Ok, I'm not in comemrcial areas. Well that's not really true, I am in some, but not insurance / bank loans / casinos etc.
But I am never surprised to see a good quality site with a few good quality links outranking sites which have spammy numbers of unnatural incoming links.
What Search engines want in the 21st century, is to be successful. To do so they need to supply their users with quality results.
It's a difficult job because there are so many people trying to exploit them in order to make money - and they use spam techniques to do so.
I won't say that spammy technique doesn't work, but I will say that it's not the only way to go - in fact, for me, it's NOT the way to go.
And I out rank some of these people; and I have very few incoming links. I have quality content and chosen quality links.
...and I have natural links which come as a result of being well placed and on topic.
The days when the only way to rank was to amass an enormous amount of incoming links are all but gone. Hooray!
Some say it may even hurt your ranking position... I don't know - I haven't and won't test that one...
Just my old O
MCS
x